In a move that has raised eyebrows and sparked debate, the US State Department has approved an emergency $3 billion arms deal with Israel, bypassing the usual congressional review process. The deal, which includes thousands of bombs, demolition kits, and bulldozers, comes amid growing concerns over a fragile truce in the region and escalating tensions.
This decision marks the second time this month that the Trump administration has invoked emergency powers to expedite weapons sales to Israel, signaling a significant shift in US foreign policy. Here’s what you need to know.
What’s in the $3 Billion Deal?
The arms package, notified to Congress on Friday, includes:
35,529 general-purpose bomb bodies for 2,000-pound bombs.
4,000 bunker-busting 2,000-pound bombs made by General Dynamics.
5,000 1,000-pound bombs and corresponding guidance kits.
Caterpillar D9 bulldozers worth $295 million.
Deliveries are set to begin in 2026, though some weapons may be sourced from existing US stockpiles, allowing for immediate transfer.
Why the Emergency Approval?
The Trump administration has invoked emergency powers to bypass the standard congressional review process, which typically allows the chairs and ranking members of the House Foreign Affairs and Senate Foreign Relations Committees to scrutinize such deals.
This move has drawn criticism from lawmakers and human rights advocates, who argue that it undermines transparency and accountability, especially given concerns about potential violations of international law.
A Shift in US Policy
This emergency arms deal follows the Trump administration’s recent decision to rescind a Biden-era order requiring the US to report potential violations of international law involving US-supplied weapons by allies, including Israel.
Critics argue that this shift in policy could embolden aggressive actions in the region, while supporters claim it strengthens US-Israel relations and ensures Israel’s security.
Truce Concerns and Regional Implications
The timing of the arms deal is particularly sensitive, as it comes amid a fragile truce and ongoing tensions in the region. Critics worry that the influx of advanced weaponry could escalate conflicts and undermine peace efforts.
Proponents, however, argue that the deal is necessary to deter aggression and ensure Israel’s ability to defend itself.
What’s Next?
As the arms deal moves forward, all eyes will be on Congress to see if lawmakers push back against the emergency approval process. Meanwhile, the international community will be watching closely to assess the impact of this decision on regional stability and US foreign policy.
