Senator Natasha Takes Akpabio to IPU Over Suspension and Sexual Harassment Claims

In a dramatic turn of events, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, the embattled lawmaker representing Kogi Central, has escalated her battle with Nigerian Senate President Godswill Akpabio to the global stage. At the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) session held during the United Nations’ Women in Parliament event in New York, Natasha accused Akpabio of unlawful suspension and sexual harassment, calling for international intervention.

Here’s a detailed look at the unfolding controversy and its implications.

Natasha’s Emotional Appeal at the IPU
In a powerful and emotional speech, Senator Natasha laid bare her grievances before the global parliamentary body. She described her six-month suspension from the Nigerian Senate as “unlawful” and an act of injustice, alleging that it was orchestrated by Senate President Akpabio.

Natasha also made shocking claims of sexual harassment, accusing Akpabio of using his position to victimize her. “I am here to seek justice and call on global democratic institutions to intervene,” she declared, urging the IPU to hold Akpabio accountable for his actions.

Safety Concerns: Fear of Retaliation
Following her speech, Natasha expressed deep concerns for her safety, revealing that she fears retaliation from “the powers that be” in Nigeria. She claimed there are plans to detain her in New York for speaking out against Akpabio at the international forum.

“I am afraid for my safety. The powers that be in Nigeria might attempt to detain me here in New York for exposing the truth,” she said, highlighting the risks she faces for standing up against alleged injustice.

The Suspension: A Controversial Move
Natasha’s suspension from the Nigerian Senate was announced in March 2025, following recommendations from the Senate’s Committee on Ethics, Rules, and Code of Conduct. The suspension bars her from:

Receiving her salary

Entering the National Assembly premises

Referring to herself as a senator during the suspension period

The move has been widely criticized as politically motivated, with many viewing it as an attempt to silence a vocal and independent lawmaker.

Why This Matters
Natasha’s decision to take her case to the IPU is significant for several reasons:

Global Spotlight: By bringing her case to an international platform, Natasha is drawing global attention to the alleged misconduct and abuse of power within Nigeria’s legislative body.

Accountability: Her actions challenge the culture of impunity and demand accountability from leaders accused of wrongdoing.

Women in Politics: As a female lawmaker, Natasha’s fight resonates with the broader struggle for gender equality and the protection of women in politics.

What’s Next?
The IPU’s response to Natasha’s allegations will be closely watched. If the body decides to investigate, it could lead to significant repercussions for Akpabio and the Nigerian Senate. Meanwhile, Natasha’s case has reignited debates about the treatment of women in Nigerian politics and the need for stronger safeguards against harassment and victimization.